Obligatory and possible in the two sentences of lamai command and prohibition (Request and reward)

Abstract

The prohibition request and(reward) the article tends to raise the issue of the three on the obligatory,possible or-non obligatory side, from the syntactic standpoint of god’s semantics, the syntax,with what is the syntax/meaning similar in constructions and formulas, through wholesale.And in that, he went beyond a common discourse that confines the indication to the direction(obligatory), in the verb(actions of the hearts or the act of tinking and belief…),and in some of the letters and their attachments.We wanted it to be a test of the concept of (obligation) in Arabic grammatical theory,based on what Sibawayh established in his book, through Lammi “The command and the prohibition”,with regard to what each of them includes in terms of a request,and what may be related to them in terms of reward and what may not be attached to the two documents in that;to the chapter ”This is a section of punishment in which the act is definitive if is an answer to captivity,prohibition,,,and on what is not definitive…With the aforementioned,wedismantled its syntactic structure and declared it by adjusting its inflection,publishing and examing it,and Al-khazel clarified all of that, in the possible(-)(obligatory),and the obligatory…then we conclucded some of the results that highlight the novelty of the concept(obligatory),in Arabic grammar;as it is a semantic syntactic concept similar to in syntax/ syntax,a representative of the Arabic transformative thought in the highest manifestations of representation and abstraction that it has reached.