Evaluation process

The articles are submitted to a double blind review by members of the scientific committee and reading specialists in the field among those covered by the journal. They each provide a detailed expert report with, in conclusion, an opinion on the publication: either “authorized publication” (A), or “Publication accepted subject to the required corrections being made” (B), or finally “publication not recommended” (C) (sheet published on the site). If both opinions are favorable to publication (A), the editor-in-chief makes a summary which he sends to the author. If both opinions express reservations (B), the anonymous sheets are sent to the author by the same route. After correction, the article is resubmitted to the same experts (as far as possible). If both opinions are unfavorable (C), the anonymous files are sent to the author by the same route. If the two opinions are contradictory, a third opinion is required from one of the members of the scientific and reading committee; the majority opinion determining the procedure for communicating the results to the author.