Analysing Modality in Nairalanders’ Discourse on the Non-Passage of the Gender Equality Bill in Nigeria
Keywords:
modality, corpus linguistics, critical discourse analysis, Nairaland(er), Gender Equality Bill (the GEO Bill), NigeriaAbstract
The successive rebuttal of the Gender and Equality Opportunity Bill (henceforth, GEO Bill) by members of the upper chamber of Nigeria’s legislature has become a discourse object of scholarly enquiry in (non)Nigerian academia. Scholars across disciplines have engaged this pertinent issue using diverse theoretical perspectives. However, scant (or no) attention has been accorded the rejection narratives in linguistic scholarship; hence, the justification for this study. Situated within corpus-assisted critical discourse studies, the study explores the modal resources in Nairalanders’ discourse on the Nigerian Senate’s rejection of the GEO Bill in 2016 and 2021, with a view to critically analysing Nairalanders’ attitudes to the Bill and its rejection as well as predominant ideologies embedded in the discourse. The data for the study consist of Nairalanders’ discourse corpora on the non-passage of the Bill in 2016 and 2021 retrieved from www.nairaland.com. A Keyword-in-Context (KWIC) and collocation analysis of the modal resources found in the corpus were also conducted using AntConc corpus analysis tool. The results reveal that Nairalanders use epistemic and deontic modal resources to dominantly express their two-pronged attitude to the GEO Bill rejection: negativism towards the Bill and positivism to its non-passage. These modal choices tacitly serve ethnic, gender and religious ideological biases that culminate in Nairalanders’ resistive engagement towards the Bill. By implication, the feasibility of gender equality in Nigeria must transcend legal measures; culture re-evaluation and national re-orientation on gender equality for sustainable development must be prioritised.
References
Ademilokun, M. A. (2019). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of modality insocial transformation campaigns in Nigeria. Discourse and Interaction, 12(2), 5-28.
Afolabi, A. A., Dahunsi, T. N. & Olateju, M. O. (2022). Modality and attitude in selected Nigerian newspaper interviews: Implications for sustainable growth and development. Journal of Global Affairs and Sustainable Development, 1, 59-70.
Agbalajobi, D. T. & Oluwalogbon, L. A. (2019). The Nigerian Senate and the politics of the non-passage of the Gender Equality Bill. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 13(3), 17-23.
Ajiboye, E. & Abioye, T. (2019). When citizens talk: Stance and representation in online discourse on Biafra agitations. Discourse & Society, 30(2), 117-134.
Akinwande, B. I. (2019). A social semiotic study of online comments on underwear ritual discourse in Nairaland. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 35-41.
Dajem Z. A. S., & Alyousef, H. S. (2020). An analysis of mood and modality in workplace discourse and the impact of power differentials: Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares. Advances in Language and Literary Studies ALLS, 11(4), 48-61.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski. M., McEnery, T., &Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylumseekers intheUKpress. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306.
Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-13.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.
Chiluwa, I., & Odebunmi, A. (2016). On terrorist attacks in Nigeria: Stance and engagement in conversations on Nairaland. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 91-109.
Cohen, E. L. (2017). Social context of media use. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, &L. Zoonen(Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of media effects (pp. 1-12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cruse, A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (2nded). Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Dash, N. S. (2010). Corpus linguistics: A general introduction. CIIL, Mysore.
Dong, J. (2013). Interpersonal metaphor in legal discourse: Modality in cross-examinations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1311-1321.
Downing, A. & Locke, P. (1995). A university course in English grammar. Phoenix ELT.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge University Press.
Honkanen, M. (2020). World Englishes on the Web: The Nigerian diaspora in the USA. John Benjamins.
Honkanen, M., & Müller, J. (2021). Interjections and emojis in Nigerian online communication. World Englishes, 40(4), 611-630.
Idehen, V. Y., & Taiwo R. (2016). Sentence typologies and civic engagement in Nairal anf forum. In R. Taiwo, & T. Opeibi (Eds.), The discourse of digital civic engagement: Perspectives from the developing world (pp. 75-90). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Iwamoto, N. (2007). Modality and point of view in media discourse. The Human Studies, Kanagawa University Journals, 173-200. human.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/gakkai/publ/pdf/no163/16308.pdf
Lillian, D. L. (2008). Modality, persuasion and manipulation in Canadian conservative discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines (CADAAD), 2(1), 1-16.
Nelson, O., Loto, G., & Omojola, O. (2018). Blogging, civic engagement, and coverage of political conflict in Nigeria: A study of Nairal and.Com. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 39, 291-298.
Okongwu, O. C. (2021). Are laws the appropriate solution: The need to adopt non-policy measures in aid of the implementation of sex discrimination laws in Nigeria. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 21(1), 26–46.
Osisanwo, A., & Akano, R. (2023a). ‘A threat to national unity, an emancipator’: Discourse construction of the Yoruba Nation secessionist agitation in selected Nigerian digital communities. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(6), 647-663.
Osisanwo, A., & Richard, A. (2023b). Ideological stances in Yoruba Nation secessionist discourse in Nigerian virtual communities. Language Matters, 54(2), 104–121.
Rui, Z., & Jingxia, L. (2018). The study of interpersonal meanings of modality inmicro-blogging news discourse by the case of Donald Trump’s Muslimentry ban. Advancesin Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 110-118.
Taiwo, R. (2011). Discursive forms and functions of flaming in Nigerian online discussion forums. Abuja Journal of English and Literary Studies, 2(1), 1-16.
Taiwo, R., & Adebayo, O. O. (2022). ‘Baby Dust to Everyoneʼ: Emoting infertility in Nigerian Online Trying to Conceive (TTC) forums. Language Text Society, 9(2), 1-15.
Taiwo, R., Akinwotu, A., & Kpolugbo, S. (2021). Linguistic impoliteness and interpersonal positioning in Nigerian online political forum. Linguistik Online, 109(4), 113–132.
Tchibozo-Laine, I. (2019). Feminism limitations through mood and modality analysis in Amma Darko’s Faceless (2003). Revue Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée, de Littérature et d’Education RILALE, 2(3), 197-219.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.
Vázquez Orta, I. (2010). A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in business management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica, 19, 77-95.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Vilar-Lluch, S. (2022). Representing behavioral pathology: The importance of modality in medical descriptions of conduct, ADHD As case study. Health Communication, 38(13), 3022-3030.
Vukovic, M. (2014). Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics1, 37-52.
Winiharti, M. (2012). The difference between modal verbs in deontic and epistemic modality. Humaniora, 3(2), 532-539.
Internet Resources
Diamant, J. (2019, April 1). The countries with the 10 largest Christian populations and the 10 largest Muslim populations. Pew Research Center. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/616878/the-countries-with-the-10-largest- christian-populations-and-the-10-largest-muslim-populations/1597596/ (Accessed12October, 2023).
Goitom, H. (2016, March 28). Nigeria: Gender Equality Bill fails in the Senate. LibraryofCongress. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2016-03-28/nigeria-gender-equality-bill-fails-in-the-senate/ (Accessed 21 May, 2023).
Iroanusi, Q. E. (2021, December 15). Again, Gender Equality Bill suffers setback at Senate. Premium Times Nigeria. https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/500980-again-gender-equality-bill-suffers-setback-at-senate.html?tztc=1 (Accessed 21May, 2023).
Naptu2. (2016, March 15). Nigerian Senate fails to pass the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill: 2:34pm On Mar 15, 2016. Nairaland Forum. https://www.nairaland.com/2991369/nigerian-senate-fails-pass-gender 1/11 (Accessed05 May, 2023).
Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC). (2016a, June 15). Gender andEqual Opportunities Bill, 2016. https://p.placbillstrack.org/8th/view.php?getid=2182(Accessed 21 May, 2023).
Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC). (2016b, April 4). Gender Equality Bill failsSenate’s 2nd Reading. https://placng.org/Legist/gender-equality-bill-fails-senates-2ndreading/ (Accessed 21 May, 2023).
SATANICALLY666 (2021, December 15). Nairaland Forum. Gender Equality Bill AntiIslam — Northern Senators: 3:42pm On Dec 15, 2021. https://www.nairaland.com/6896860/gender-equality-bill-anti-islam-northern
(Accessed 17 May, 2023).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adetutu Aragbuwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
