Peer Review Process

• Submission: Authors submit their manuscript via the ASJP platform.

• Plagiarism Check: The article is scanned for similarity using plagiarism detection software.

• Initial Screening:

  • The Editor-in-Chief or an Associate Editor reviews the manuscript for scope, formatting, and basic quality.

• Reviewer Assignment:

  • The Editor-in-Chief may send the article directly to 2-3 reviewers.

  • Alternatively, an Associate Editor may assign 2-3 reviewers for evaluation.

• Peer Review:

  • Reviewers assess the article and submit their reports via ASJP.

  • They recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on quality, originality, and relevance.

• Editorial Decision:

  • Based on reviewer feedback, the Editor-in-Chief makes a decision:

    • Accepted (possibly with minor revisions)

    • Major Revisions Required (resubmission after changes)

    • Rejected

• Corrections & Resubmission:

  • If revisions are required, the author submits a revised version via ASJP.

  • The revised manuscript may be reviewed again if necessary.

• Final Acceptance:

  • Once approved, the article is sent for final formatting and proofreading.

• Publication:

  • The final version is published.