Post-apocalypse As Ecological Palimpsest In Katie Hale’s My Name Is Monster (2019): From Collapse And Ashes To Resurgence And Continuance
Keywords:
Ecological resilience, Environmental degradation, Hale’s My name is monster, Post-apocalyptic literary genre, Struggle for survivalAbstract
This academic paper has sought to delve into Katie Hale’s My name is monster (2019) as a work of fiction that might be interpreted within the conventions of the post-apocalyptic literary genre. This endeavour, thus, while framed with the formal, thematic and linguistic boundaries of the latter, is meant to study the end of the human civilisation the way the novel has envisioned it in a relevant parallel with the current planetary ecological crises which threaten life in a multitude of ways. There is also appeal, in a significant deflection, to nature’s capacity to resurge, at various proportions, back to life after being the subject of anthropogenic despoliation, either minor or major, with the ongoing, pervasive and tangible environmental catastrophes. The theoretical foundations upon which this article has rested, in the first position, encompass a wide range of insights connected to the post-apocalyptic genre borrowed from theorists including Claire P. Curtis, Heather J. Hicks and Mathias Clasen; furthermore, there is a conspicuous reliance, in the second, on C. S. Holling’s concept, he has dubbed ecological resilience showcasing that the novel’s delineated apocalypse is not perhaps the end, but rather a new beginning. Underpinned by these notions, I argue, that Hale’s text has confronted the twenty-first century readers and the author’s contemporaries with the ecological calamities humans have engendered on a planetary level while maintaining a positive outlook for the future if environment-oriented practices, modes of action and ways of life, both at individual and community dimensions, are to be fostered and implemented.
References
Alford, F. C. (1985). Science and the revenge of nature: Marcus and Habermas. University of South Florida Press.
Asimov, I., & Pohl, F. (2018). Our angry earth. Tor Books.
Bampatzimopoulos, S. (2025). Survival politics: Liquid modernity and the state of nature in The last of us. Journal of American Studies of Turkey, (64), 23–37.
Bellarsi, F. (2009). The challenges of nature and ecology. Comparative American Studies an International Journal, 7(2), 71–84, https://doi.org/10.1179/147757009x447636
Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing and the formation of American culture. Harvard University Press.
Buell, L. (2001). Writing for an endangered world: Literature, culture, and environment in the U.S and beyond. Harvard University Press.
Cassegård, C., & Thörn, H. (2022). Post-apocalyptic environmentalism: The green movement in times of catastrophe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cinerari, R. (2025). Hope deferred: Post-apocalyptic fiction as anti-utopia. SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, 15(30), 109–129, https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/6632
Clasen, M. (2019). Imagining the end of the world: A biocultural analysis of post-apocalyptic fiction. In Evolution and Popular Narrative (pp.1–19)0. Brill.
Curtis, P. C. (2010). Postapocalyptic fiction and the social contract: “We will not go home again”. Lexington Books.
Englund, L. (2024). Shifting temporalities and future-oriented ends in two end-of-life memoirs. Parallax, 30(4), 458–475, https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2024.2494397 .
Erkan, F. G. (2024). Challenging anthropocentrism in eco-science fiction novels. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. The University of Georgia Press.
Hale, K. (2019). My name is monster. Canongate.
Hicks, J. H. (2016). The post-apocalyptic novel in the twenty-first century: Modernity beyond salvage. Palgrave Macmillan.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
Houfková, K. (2019). The warning function of post-apocalyptic science fiction. Messages, Sages and Ages, 6(1), 59–65.
Joyce, S. (2024). The beautiful apocalypse. Parallax, 30(4), 442–457, https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2024.2494395
Moon, H. J. (2014). The post-apocalyptic turn: A study of contemporary apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic narrative. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Mukherjee, S. (2024). “Survival is insufficient”: A critical exploration of optimism and nostalgia in the postapocalyptic world of Station eleven. Brolly, 5(1), 219–237.
Naess, A. (2008). The life and work of Arne Naess: An appreciative overview by Alan Drengson. In Alan Drengson and Bill Devall (Eds.), The ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. (pp. 03–41). Publishers Group West.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. Routledge.
Stephen, M. (2024). Memory, identity and nostalgia: Facing life loss at the end of days. Parallax, 30(4), pp. 426–441, https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2024.2494394
Stifflemire, B. S. (2017). Visions of after the end: A history and theory of the post-apocalyptic genre in literature and film. The University of Alabama.
Thaler, M. (2024). Eco-miserabilism and radical hope: On the utopian vision of post-apocalyptic environmentalism. American Political Science Review, 118(1), 318–331.
Tso, A., & Joyce, S. (2024). Apocalyptic legacies: Writing the end in fiction and non-fiction. Parallax, 30(4), pp. 379–389, https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2024.2494390



