Ai And Creative Research In Algerian Universities: Faculty Perspectives On Integration
Keywords:
AI integration, Algerian universities, creative research, ethical challenges, faculty perspectivesAbstract
This study investigates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the creativity of research processes within Algerian universities from the perspective of faculty members. The research hypothesizes that faculty members generally perceive AI integration positively, recognizing its potential to enhance creativity and streamline research processes. Additionally, it anticipates concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI use, potential dependency on AI tools, and the adequacy of current training and resources. A descriptive approach was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 40 faculty members from various departments. Qualitative content analysis was performed to identify recurring themes and patterns. The findings confirmed that AI positively impacts research creativity through advanced data analysis tools, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovative problem-solving methodologies. Notably, machine learning algorithms and natural language processing were identified as particularly beneficial. However, the study also validated concerns related to AI’s ethical implications, potential dependency, and insufficient training and resources. The results emphasize the need for targeted strategies, including comprehensive training programs and the development of ethical guidelines, to effectively integrate AI into research. Faculty members expressed a demand for additional workshops, courses, and technical support to enhance their skills and confidence with AI technologies. These insights suggest that while AI has the potential to transform research creativity in Algerian universities, addressing these barriers is essential for successful and ethical implementation.
References
Akinwalere, S. A. and Ivanov, V. T. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities, Crossing Border, 12(1), 1-15DOI: 10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015
Bennett, L.&Abusalem, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education, Athens Journal of Education, 11(3), 195-212https://www.athensjournals.gr/education/2024-11-3-2-Bennett.pdf
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Cordeiro, R., &Gennaro, C. (2021). AI and creative writing: An overview of applications and challenges. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 36(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa035
Chubb, J., Cowling, P. and Reed, D. (2022). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AIin the research process, AI &SOCIETY ,37, 1439–1457 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01259-0
Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., &Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating "art" by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07068. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068
Eubanks, V. (2018).Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punishthepoor. St. Martin's Press.
Harris, J. (2020). The importance of creative research in the modern university: Art, knowledge, and social impact. International Journal of Education & Arts, 21(4), 1-15.
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
Leavy, P. (2018).Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The GuilfordPress.
McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence(pp. 103-119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11717-4_8
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data &Society, 3(2), 205395171667967.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Mostari, H., A. (2018). Languages in the Digital Age: Evidence from Sms Language inAlgeria, Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society,1(1), 1-12. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/144568
Nimbalagundi1, S.M.,Bagawan, A. S., andKatageri, K. S. (2024). Artificial IntelligenceinHigher Education, International Research Journal on Advanced EngineeringandManagement, 2(9), 2790- 2795 https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0406
Oussou, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of EFL Students’ Use of Icton Developing theirAutonomy, Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 3 (1) (special issue), 89-101. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/125433
Schleicher, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence in education: Implications and opportunities. OECDEducation Working Papers, No. 170. OECD Publishing. Retrievedfromhttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/artificial-intelligence-in-education_2f27e4c3- en
Tomat, L (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Research: Insights fromCo-occurrence Analysis, Valetta, Malta & Online, 399-408https://toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-30-7/85.pdf
Zouhaier, S. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education: An Empirical Study European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10 (1), 17-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1384682.pdf
