English Language Learners’ Perspectives On Implementing Gpts For Learning Purposes In The Context Of Ai Literacy-focused Pedagogical And Assessment Approach
Keywords:
English for academic purposes, English language learners, generative AI, generative pre-trained transformers, writingAbstract
As AI-powered chatbots become prevalent in academia, there is a need for research practitioners working with English language learners (ELLs) to examine how students use generative AI (GenAI) for learning purposes. Teachers and researchers express concern with the potential detrimental impact of GenAI on ELLs’ intellectual engagement with learning (e.g., Barrot, 2023; Cardon et al., 2023; Cong-Lem et al., 2024). Meanwhile, emerging research highlights that for language educators, it is essential to evolve with technological advancements and - instead of attempting to avoid the unavoidable use of GenAI - apply such tools to promote sustained learning (Bui & Tong, 2025; Warschauer et al., 2023; Yeo, 2023).This article reports on a study in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course that incorporated ChatGPT into scaffolded assessment practices. The study explored students’ experiences using ChatGPT to brainstorm and revise their writing while immersed in AI literacy-focused instruction. Its post-instruction survey findings demonstrate that although students perceive GenAI as a tool to adapt to their learning needs, thereby enhancing language skills, they also recognize GenAI limitations (e.g., inaccurate output) and share concerns that are common among educators (e.g., overdependency on AI tools and breaching academic integrity). The implications suggest that when used responsibly, GenAI can supplement rather than replace students’ work. Educators might benefit from adopting a pedagogical and assessment framework focused on critical thinking, creativity, and digital literacy skills. Such approach fosters active learning through scaffolded formative assessments targeted at deconstructing, evaluating, and consciously incorporating GenAI-generated text into one’s writing.
References
Amin, M. J. M. (2023). AI and Chat GPT in language teaching: Enhancing EFL support and transforming assessment techniques. International Journal of Higher Pedagogies, 4(4), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v4i4.554
Avsheniuk, N., Lutsenko, O., Svyrydiuk, T., & Seminikhyna, N. (2024). Empowering language learners’ critical thinking: Evaluating ChatGPT's role in English course implementation. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on ChatGPT, 210-224. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.14
Barrot, J. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Birenbaum, M. (2023). The chatbots’ challenge to education: Disruption or destruction? Education Sciences, 13(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070711
Bui, T. T. U., & Tong, T. V. A. (2025). The impact of AI writing tools on academic integrity: Unveiling English-majored students’ perceptions and practical solutions. Asia CALL Online Journal, 16(1), 83-110. https://dx.doi.org/10.54855/acoj.251615
Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517
Chan, S., Lo, N., & Wong, A. (2024). Leveraging generative AI for enhancing university level English writing: comparative insights on automated feedback andstudent engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2440182. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2440182
Cong-Lem, N., Tran, T. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and responses of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.56297/FSYB3031/MXNB7567
Darwin, M., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., &Marzuki. (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 229034. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Du, J., & Alm, A. (2024). The Impact of ChatGPT on English for academic purposes (EAP)students’ language learning experience: A self-determination theory perspective. Education Sciences,14(7), 726-743. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070726
Eaton, L. (2023, June 12). Query log template. By Any Other Nerd. https://www.byanyothernerd.com/2023/06/recent-talks-on-generative-ai-and.html
Elkhatat, A.M., Elsaid, K. & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5
Gewirtz, D. (2024, Dec. 16). 7 ways to write better ChatGPT prompts - and get the results youwant faster. ZDNET. https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-ways-to-write-better-chatgpt-prompts-and-get-the-results-you-want-faster/
Ho, C. C. (2023). ChatGPT as a tool for developing paraphrasing skills among ESL learners. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.24191/cplt.v11i2.21723
Ibrahim, K. (2023). Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESLwriting: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”. Language Testing in Asia,13(46). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2
Ibrahim, K., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2024). Potentials and implications of ChatGPT for ESL writing instruction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7820
The International Center for Academic Integrity [ICAI]. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd Ed.). https://academicintegrity.org/aws/ICAI/pt/sp/values
Jagdishbhai, N., & Thakkar, K. Y. (2023). Exploring the capabilities and limitations of GPT and Chat GPT in natural language processing. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 10(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2023.004
Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(35). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual
Dif erences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kavanagh, B. (2022). Assessing AI-based summarizing and paraphrasing tools for a CLIL intercultural communication academic writing class. Intercultural Communication Studies, 31(2), 93-110.
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Su, F. (2025). Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners' experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education:Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371
Lee, Y. J., & Davis, R. O. (2024). A case study of implementing generative AI in university’s general English courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep533. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15218
Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y.-F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G.-C. (2023). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5614-5632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environment, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Nghi, T. T., & Phuc, T. H. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in developing critical digital literacies in language learning: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the Asia CALL International Conference, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2341
Niloy, A. C, Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., & Rahman, S.I.U. (2024). Is ChatGPT amenace for creative writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929.
Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development ofEFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Qu, K., & Wu, X. (2024). ChatGPT as a CALL tool in language education: A study of hedonic motivation adoption models in English learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19471–19503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12598-y
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things andCyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning &Teaching, 6(1), 342-263. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Silalahi, R. M. (2024). Student perspectives on paraphrasing English texts: With and without ChatGPT. Proceedings of International Conference on Language Pedagogy (ICOLP), 4(1), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.24036/icolp.v4i1.226
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiersin Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Tajik, E., & Tajik, F. (2024). A comprehensive examination of the potential applicationofChat GPT in higher education institutions. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4699304
Thorp, H. H. (2023). Chat GPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Toma, R.B., & Yánez-Pérez, I. (2024). Effects of ChatGPT use on undergraduate students’creativity: a threat to creative thinking? Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(74). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00172-x
Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., &Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215, 105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031
Vukovic, R. (2023, May 5). ChatGPT lesson activity: Secondary students testing the fallibility of AI. Teacher Magazine. https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/chatgptlesson-activity-secondary-students-testing-the-fallibility-of-ai
Warschauer, M., Waverly, T., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., &Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a secondor foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(26). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
Wu, Y. (2024). Study on the impact of utilizing ChatGPT and other AI tools for feedback in EAP writing classrooms on the discursive writing performance of English Major students. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 4, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.62051/4se95x52
Xu, S., Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2024). Exploring the impact of the use of ChatGPT on foreign language self-efficacy among Chinese students studying abroad: The mediating role of foreign language enjoyment. Heliyon, 10(21), e39845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39845
Yeo, M. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) author in gapps. TESOL Journal, 14(1), e716. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716
Youseff, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Malek, M. A. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: Asurvey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316
Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System, 121, 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259
Zhou, X., Teng, D., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024). The mediating role of generative AI self regulation on students’ critical thinking and problem-solving. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121302