Shared Perspectives Of Spiritual Blindness And Deadness In D.h. Lawrence’s The Blind Man And James Joyce’s The Dead
Keywords:
Human Limitations, Spiritual Blindness/Deadness, Spiritual Sightedness/Aliveness, James Joyce's The Dead, D. H. Lawrence's The Blind ManAbstract
Modernist literature frequently explores themes of psychological and emotional stagnation, reflecting the anxieties of an era marked by rapid social and cultural change. However, while much research has examined individual portrayals of alienation and existential paralysis in modernist fiction, fewer studies have investigated how different authors employ distinct metaphors—such as death and blindness—to critique the limitations of human perception and emotional growth. Addressing this gap, this study conducts a comparative qualitative analysis of James Joyce’s The Dead and D.H. Lawrence’s The Blind Man to explore their shared theme of spiritual deadness and its implications for human relationships and self-awareness. This study seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) How do Joyce and Lawrence use the motifs of death and blindness, respectively, to represent spiritual deadness? (2) In what ways do both texts offer moments of reversal, where the dead regain life and the blind acquire a form of sight? (3) How do these literary representations critique modern life and its failure to provide genuine emotional or spiritual fulfilment? Through a comparative interpretive analysis, this study closely examines the protagonists' internal and external worlds, demonstrating how Joyce and Lawrence not only depict spiritual paralysis but also introduce dimensions of renewal. By exploring the tensions between spiritual deadness and aliveness, this research highlights how both authors expose the limitations of modern existence, where seemingly living and sighted individuals struggle to achieve true emotional or spiritual awakening.
References
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Clausson, N. (2007). Practicing deconstruction, again: Blindness, insight and the lovely treachery of words in D. H. Lawrence's The Blind Man. College Literature, 34(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2007.0002
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time. HarperCollins.
Hodge, E. M. (2018). Dead-survivors, the living dead, and concepts of death. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0377-9
Joyce, J. (2005). The dead. In P. M. Parker (Ed.), Dubliners (pp. 181–221). ICON Group International.
Kenner, H. (1956). Dubliners’ Joyce. Faber and Faber.
Kundu, D. (2015, January 4). The paradox of morality: Death and perpetrated denial. In Death representation in literature: Forms and theories (pp. 8–22). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Latham, S. (Ed.). (2004). The Cambridge companion to James Joyce. Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, D. H. (1990). The blind man. In England, my England and other stories. Cambridge University Press.
Leavis, F. R. (1955). D. H. Lawrence: Novelist. Chatto and Windus.
Majoul, B. (2024). The power of literature: Can the dead speak? Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society, 7(1), 159–167.
Makepeace, Ch. (2022, November 4). Seeing is (not) knowing: Blindness, knowledge and alternate sensory modalities in D. H. Lawrence’s The Blind Man. The Modernist Review. https://modernistreviewcouk.wordpress.com/2022/11/04/seeing-is-not-knowing-blindness-knowledge-and-alternate-sensory-modalities-in-d-h-lawrences-the-blind-man/
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1974). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Norris, M. (2020). Joyce’s Dubliners and the invention of modernist literature. Cambridge University Press.
Pang, W., Liu, C., Ni, R., & Fu, X. (2020). Superiority of blind over sighted listeners in voice recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(2), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001804
Richins, M. L. (2017). Materialism and spirituality: The role of meaning in life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.007
Rybicki, A., Lewandowska, M., & Michalak, A. (2020). Blindness: Physical or spiritual? An attempt at an interdisciplinary analysis. Verbum et Ecclesia, 41(1), Article a2084. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v41i1.2084
Salter, L. (2013). D.H. Lawrence and fictional representations of blood-consciousness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/5234/1/Salter14PhD.pdf
Saramago, J. (1995). Blindness (G. Pontiero, Trans.). Harcourt.
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge.
Schilder, W. H. (1961). The consciousness of Joyce’s Dubliners. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 60(2), 151–167.
Shakespeare, W. (2000). The tragedy of Hamlet. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1603)
Tolstoy, L. (1917). The death of Ivan Ilyich (L. & A. Maude, Trans.). Signet.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walter, T. (2017). How the dead survive: Ancestor, mortality, memory. In M. H. Jacobson (Ed.), Postmortal society (pp. 19–39). Routledge.
