Oh Silly Daddy Pig! A Positioning Analysis Of Post-feminist Masculinity In ‘peppa Pig’ Cartoon Narratives

Authors

  • Fatima Zohra Benabdellah PhD Student, University of Abdelhamid Ibn Badis-Mostaganem, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Gender Studies, Languages and Sociolinguistic Diversity (GSLSD) https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6288-6130
  • Leila Benstaali Lecturer, University of Abdelhamid Ibn Badis-Mostaganem, Faculty of Foreign Languages, t Gender Studies, Languages and Sociolinguistic Diversity (GSLSD)

Keywords:

Cartoons, gender, masculinity, positioning, post-feminism

Abstract

Cartoon shows are ubiquitous elements in children’s early media experience. They serve as cultural repertoires, disseminating social values and norms. Through constant exposure to captivating visual narratives, children develop perceptions of their social reality and shape their knowledge about the world around them. Cartoon characters provide children with exemplary models who teach them how to perform their masculinity(s) and femininity(s) adeptly. Children classify the knowledge they acquire from cartoons as appropriate cultural norms and acceptable gender-typed behaviors. These shows are helpful learning tools, especially with the presence of appealing characters that are visually captivating. This qualitative research is particularly interested in contributing to the burgeoning trend of post-feminist readings of animation. The study focuses on masculine identity portrayals in the British animated series ‘Peppa Pig’. It explores how Daddy Pig’s masculinity is navigated through narratives. The aim is to unveil how masculine identity attends to dominant discourses. This article draws upon Bamberg’s (1997a) and (2020) positioning analysis and dilemmatic spaces in retrospect to a discussion of post-feminist sensibilities. The findings reveal that Daddy Pig represents a ‘New Man’ model. Throughout the episodes, he performs his masculine authority as a providing father who accepts handling domestic chores. Unlike traditional patriarchs, Daddy Pig is an affectionate and caring man of the house who humorously experiences vulnerability and helplessness.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662.

Alexiou, T., & Kokla, N. (2019). Cartoons that make a difference: A linguistic analysis of Peppa Pig. Journal of Linguistics and Education Research, 1(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v1i1.314

Al-Jbouri, E., & Pomerantz, S. (2020). A new kind of monster, cowboy, and crusader?: gender hegemony and flows of masculinities in Pixar animated films. Boyhood Studies, 13(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.3167/BHS.2020.130104

Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Field, D. E., Collins, P. A., & Nathan, J. G. (1986). Television viewing at home: Age trends in visual attention and time with TV. Child Development, 57(4), 1024-1033. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130376

Antoniazzi, A. (2019). Born to win. Children's literature and male models. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 14(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/8695

Archer, L. (2001). Muslim Brothers, Black lads, traditional Asians: British Muslim young men’s construction of race, religion and masculinity. Feminism & Psychology 11(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011001005

Ariès, P. (1996). Centuries of childhood (R. Baldick, Trans.; with an introduction by A. Phillips). Pimlico. (Original work published 1960)

Azmi, N. J., Ab Rashid, R., Rahman, M. A., & Safawati Basirah, Z. (2016). Gender and speech in a Disney princess movie. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(6), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.5N.6P.235

Bamberg, M. G. (1997a). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335-342.

Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. Handbook of identity theory and research, 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8

Bamberg. M. (2012). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 85–102). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037//13620-006

Bamberg, M. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & psychology, 21(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309355852

Bamberg, M. (2020). Narrative analysis: An integrative approach. Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences, 243-264.

Bamberg, M. (2022). Positioning the subject: Agency Between Master and Counter. In: Bosančić, S., Brodersen, F., Pfahl, L., Schürmann, L., Spies, T., Traue, B. (eds) Positioning the Subject. Subjektivierung und Gesellschaft/Studies in Subjectivation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38539-2_2

Bamberger, K. (2022). The Peppa Pig Phenomenon [English Honors Papers, The City University of New York]. In Anthropomorphism in Literature and Culture: An Anthology of writing from 399W, Spring 2022. https://2022anthology.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/21560/files/2018/10/KristenBamberger_ENGL399W_SeniorThesis.pdf

Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects (pp. 110-140). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03

Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 8(4), 598-616.

Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Binkley, M. (2016). An argument on Disney and psychological development. URJ-UCCS: Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCS, 10(1), 11-18. https://urj.uccs.edu/index.php/urj/article/view/232

Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in Fiction and Film. Cornell University Press.

Cheung, M., Leung, C. A., & Huang, Y. J. (2022). Absentee Parents in Disney Feature-length Animated Movies: What are Children Watching?. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-021-00799-0

Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.

Connell, R.W. (2005). Globalization, imperialism, and masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 71-89. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833.n5

Connell, R.W., Messerschmidt, J.W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19 (6), 829-859. 10.1177/0891243205278639

Dunn, E.A. (2011). Talking Animals: A Literature review of anthropomorphism in children's books. UNC: Carolina Digital Repository.

http://cdr.lib.unc.edu/indexablecontent/uuid:627a29d7-25f1-4481-9363-72e74c0c4b3f

Estrada-Chichón, J. L. (2023). Animated television series as a didactic tool for EFL acquisition in early childhood education: An analysis of the features of Peppa Pig by student teachers. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2023.2248690

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43–67). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Gill, R. (2014). Powerful women, vulnerable men and postfeminist masculinity in men's popular fiction. Gender & Language, 8(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v8i2.185

Gillam, K., & Wooden, S. R. (2008). Post-princess models of gender: The new man in Disney/Pixar. Journal of popular film and television, 36(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.3200/JPFT.36.1.2-8

Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 361-367.

Harro, Bobbie (2000). The cycle of socialization. In M. Adams, W. Blumenfeld, R. Castaneda, H. Hackman, M Peters & X. Zuniga (eds.) Readings for diversity and social justice: An anthology on racism, sexism, art Semitism, heterosexism classism, and ableism (pp. 15-21). New York: Routledge.

Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind grows up: Reflections on new research on theory of mind in middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.017

Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 367-393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367

Jefferson,T. (2002). Subordinating hegemonic masculinity. Theoretical Criminology 6(1): 63-88.

Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-development analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. The development of sex difference.

Kroskrity, P. V. (1999). Identity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1- 2).111-114.

https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.111

Levine, E. (2005). Fractured fairy tales and fragmented markets: Disney’s weddings of a lifetime and the cultural politics of media conglomeration. Television & New Media, 6(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476403255820

Macaluso, M. (2018). Postfeminist masculinity: the new Disney norm? Social Sciences, 7(11), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110221

MacInnes, J. (1998). End of masculinity. McGraw-Hill Education.

Madej, K. (2003). Towards digital narrative for children: from education to entertainment, a historical perspective. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950585

Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children's search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current directions in psychological science, 13(2), 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x

Morgan, M. (2009). Cultivation analysis and media effects. The Sage handbook of media processes and effects, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976077.n10

Papasarantopoulos, N., & Cohen, S. B. (2021). Narration generation for cartoon videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06803. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.06803

Piaget, J. (1961). Le développement des mécanismes de la perception. Bulletin de psychologie, 14(187), 368-374.

Robinson, T., Callister, M., Magoffin, D., & Moore, J. (2007). The portrayal of older characters in Disney animated films. Journal of aging studies, 21(3), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.10.001

Romer, N. (1981). The Sex-Role Cycle: socialization from infancy to old age. Feminist Press.

Rumens, N. (2017). Postfeminism, men, masculinities and work: A research agenda for gender and organization studies scholars. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12138

Shaikh, M. S., & Khan, U. (2012). Constructing gender identities in discourse: A critical discourse analysis of two short stories. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 153-160.

Soares, T. O. (2017). Animated films and linguistic stereotypes: A critical discourse analysis of accent use in Disney animated films (Master’s thesis, Bridgewater State University). BSU Master’s Theses and Projects, 53. https://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/53

Turner, L. H., R. L. West. (1998). Perspectives on Family Communication. Mountain View/ Mayfield Publishing.

Whitehead, S. M. (2002). Men and Masculinities: Key themes and new directions. Polity Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

How to Cite

Benabdellah, F. Z. ., & Benstaali , L. . (2026). Oh Silly Daddy Pig! A Positioning Analysis Of Post-feminist Masculinity In ‘peppa Pig’ Cartoon Narratives. The Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society, 8(4), 488–500. Retrieved from https://univ-bejaia.dz/revue/jslcs/article/view/828