Assessing Online Pronunciation Tutors For Improving L2 Learners English Problematic Phoneme

Authors

  • Julianah Ajoke Akindele Department of English and Literary Studies, Osun State University https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8198-4008
  • Victor Ayomide Fabunmi Department of English and Literary Studies, Osun State University

Keywords:

Online pronunciation tutors, L2 learners', Problematic English phonemes, Pronunciation, Classroom, Real-time feedback, Autonomous learning

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of online pronunciation platforms in helping second language (L2) learners of English overcome difficulties with problematic phonemes, which are sounds that L2 learners often struggle to perceive and articulate. These phonemes include English sounds like /θ/, /ð/, /v/ and /tʃ/, each presenting unique challenges due to unfamiliar articulation or differences from similar sounds in the learner’s native language. Online pronunciation platforms, incorporating technologies such as artificial intelligence, real-time feedback, and interactive exercises, provide accessible and adaptive pronunciation training that addresses these difficulties. The need for online pronunciation tools stems from traditional instruction’s limitations, particularly in offering individualised feedback and sufficient pronunciation practice in a variety of linguistic contexts. Participants in this research include L2 learners of English from Osun State University who actively utilise online pronunciation tools, such as ELSA Speak, SpeechAce.The outcomes reveal that 80% use online platforms regularly (daily or weekly), and 85% find these tools effective or very effective in improving pronunciation. A majority (60%) reported significant improvement, particularly with problematic phonemes like /θ/ and /ð/. Online platforms such as ELSA Speak and SpeechAce provide real-time feedback, interactive exercises, and progress tracking, with 70% of participants affirming the effectiveness of these features in correcting pronunciation errors. Also, 90% agreed that these tools promote autonomous learning. Despite their advantages, 45% of respondents noted limitations, including a lack of communicative practice and nuanced feedback. While 55% believed that online tools could not replace traditional classroom instruction, 55% suggested incorporating real-time communicative scenarios to enhance their effectiveness. This study concludes that online pronunciation platforms are a valuable complement to traditional methods, offering innovative solutions for improving L2 pronunciation accuracy and autonomy, while emphasizing the need for enhancements to address contextual communication skills.

References

Akindele, J. A., & Fabunmi, V. A. (2024). English segmental pedagogy, homophonic realisation and communicative competence in second language (L2) acquisition. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society (JSLCS), 7(1), 33–58. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/250264

Akindele, J., Fabunmi, V., & Akano, R. (2023). Use of information communication technology in spoken English learning in selected public and private secondary schools ESL classroom. International Journal of Multilingualism and Languages for Specific Purposes, 5(1), 67–91.

Akindele, J. A. (2022). An appraisal of online teaching (Google Classroom) of a spoken English course to L2 learners in a Nigerian university during COVID-19 pandemic. In F. Kilickaya, J. Kic-Drgas, & R. Nahlen (Eds.), The challenges and opportunities of teaching English worldwide in the COVID-19 pandemic (pp. 144–149). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Akindele, J. A. (2020). Repositioning spoken English pedagogy for sustainable development through the use of functional and digital language laboratory in an ESL classroom. Journal of English Scholars’ Association of Nigeria, 22(1), 286–308.

Akindele, J. A. (2019). Discrepancy in spoken and written English: Pedagogical implications for English as second language learners and speakers. Syllabus Review: Multi-Disciplinary Journal of the École Normale Supérieure, 8(1), 190–208.

Bernstein, J., Najmi, A., & Ehsani, F. (2010). The effect of virtual human tutors on language learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(3), 257–274.

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–206). York Press.

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.

Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology. John Benjamins Publishing.

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins Publishing.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners' English pronunciation learning and the strategies for instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1279–1285.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2016). English pronunciation instruction: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 1–6.

Gimson, A. C. (1962). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. Edward Arnold.

Gilbert, J. (2005). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension. Cambridge University Press.

Golonka, E. M., Park, J. S., & Smith, J. M. (2014). The effects of interactive pronunciation exercises on learners' pronunciation accuracy. System, 45, 397–406.

Hinrichs, E., Simpson, J., & Schmidt, T. (2015). Automated speech recognition for language learning: A review. ReCALL, 27(2), 141–155.

Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English pronunciation. Longman.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice-Hall.

Knight, R. (2017). Using video recordings to promote pronunciation awareness in EFL teacher trainees. The Language Learning Journal, 45(3), 305–318.

Kruk, M. (2014). Online language tutoring: Benefits and challenges. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 1–11.

Ladefoged, P. (2003). A course in phonetics (5th ed.). Wadsworth.

Levis, J. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Levis, J. M. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 171–184.

Levis, J., & Sonsaat, S. (2017). Pronunciation learning and teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 311–328). Routledge.

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Miller, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in language learning: How AI-powered apps are changing pronunciation learning. Tech Trends Journal, 64(2), 102–108.

Morin, J. (2015). Stress and intonation in English. Routledge.

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

Pennington, M. C. (2014). Electronic media in second language writing. John Benjamins Publishing.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

Van Patten, B. (1996). Input and second language acquisition. Newbury House.

Walker, R. (2014). Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-18

How to Cite

Ajoke Akindele, J. ., & Ayomide Fabunmi, V. . (2025). Assessing Online Pronunciation Tutors For Improving L2 Learners English Problematic Phoneme. The Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society, 8(2), 381–396. Retrieved from https://univ-bejaia.dz/revue/jslcs/article/view/690