Introductory Paper: Reconstituting Terrain: Artificial Intelligence and the Scholarly Reckoning in Language, Culture, and Society
Keywords:
AI ethics, artificial intelligence, cultural negotiation, education, interdisciplinarity, language and culture, sociolinguisticsAbstract
The rapid incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into domains such as language, education, and cultural output represents not only a technological advancement but also a significant transformation of epistemic, linguistic, and social landscapes. This introductory paper positions the December issue of the Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society (JSLCS) as a significant intervention in this transformation. It argues that interdisciplinary dialogue is a crucial scholarly response to the limitations, biases, and cultural entrenchment of contemporary AI systems. The paper advocates for a scholarly assessment that considers both large-scale disruptions and the localized agency of communities within specific sociolinguistic, institutional, and postcolonial frameworks, moving past polarized views of techno-optimism and technological determinism. This analysis employs recent advancements in the AI philosophy, cultural psychology, and critical humanities to critique the integration of statistical prediction with understanding, highlight the biases inherent in generative AI, and emphasize the cultural negotiations necessary for AI adoption in diverse global contexts. This introductory article contextualizes the contributions of this issue within three interconnected thematic clusters: AI as a pedagogical and translational agent; the evolution of teaching and learning paradigms; and the discursive, literary, and sociolinguistic reconfiguration of identity, memory, and power in digitally mediated societies. Collectively, the articles advance genealogical, rhizomatic, and metaphorical perspectives that reconnect technological inquiry with humanistic critique. This issue emphasizes the perspectives of marginalized regions and academic disciplines, placing language, culture, and society at the forefront of discussions regarding responsible, ethical, and culturally attuned AI, thereby encouraging a global, critical, and human-centric conversation among an international audience.
References
Ababsia, N. (2025). Pragmatic Translation Between Non-Specialization and AI Challenges: A Critical Philosophical Analysis. مجلة الدراسات والبحوث الاجتماعية, 13(1), 390–413. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/276406
Afreen, J., Mohaghegh, M., & Doborjeh, M. (2025). Systematic literature review on bias mitigation in generative AI. AI and Ethics, 5(5), 4789–4841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00721-9
Almatarneh, S., Bani Mustafa, A., Samara, G., Alazaidah, R., & Obeidat, Q. (2026). Bias and fairness in NLP: Addressing social and cultural biases. In I. Rojas, G. Joya, & A. Catala (Eds.), Advances in Computational Intelligence (IWANN 2025, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 16009). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02728-3_49
Asch, M., Moore, T., Badia, R., Beck, M., Beckman, P., Bidot, T., … Zacharov, I. (2018). Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to convergence—Toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 32(4), 435–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342018778123
Bhardwaj, A., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the limits of reason: A framework for responsible use in public and private sectors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1565. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05749-0
Bishop, J. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning will not fix it. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 513474.
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., … Xie, X. (2024). A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 15(3), 1–45.
Chen, Z., Xu, L., Zheng, H., Chen, L., Tolba, A., Zhao, L., … Feng, H. (2024). Evolution and prospects of foundation models: From large language models to large multimodal models. Computers, Materials & Continua, 80(2).
Christou, P. A. (2025). A critical inquiry into the personal and societal perils of artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 5(3), 2547–2555.
Floridi, L. (2025). A conjecture on a fundamental trade-off between certainty and scope in symbolic and generative AI. Philosophy & Technology, 38(93), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00927-z
Ge, X., Xu, C., Tsai, J. L., & Markus, H. R. (2025). How culture shapes what people want from AI. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642660
Govia, L. (2020). Coproduction, ethics and artificial intelligence: A perspective from cultural anthropology. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(3), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i3.53
Hayles, N. K. (2022). Inside the mind of an AI: Materiality and the crisis of representation. New Literary History, 54(1), 635–666. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.a898324
Solomon, H. G., & Baio, C. (2020). An argument for an ecosystemic AI: Articulating connections across prehuman and posthuman intelligences. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 3(4), 559–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00092-5
Hila, A. (2025). The epistemological consequences of large language models: Rethinking collective intelligence and institutional knowledge. AI & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02426-3
Howell, B. (2024). Regulating artificial intelligence in a world of uncertainty. American Enterprise Institute
Idri, N., Sarnou, H., & Schug, D. (Eds.). (2025). AI in education / (Dis)embodied interActions [Special issue]. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture, and Society, 8(1).
Johnsen, M. (2024). Large language models (LLMs). Maria Johnsen. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society. (n.d.). Presentation. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/PresentationRevue/681 and https://univ-bejaia.dz/revue/jslcs/about
Kamran, A. (2023). Decolonizing artificial intelligence: Unveiling biases, power dynamics, and colonial continuities in AI systems. RMS Journal.
Landay, J., Altman, R., Nyarko, J., Christin, A., Langlotz, C., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2025, December). Stanford AI experts predict what will happen in 2026. Stanford News. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/12/stanford-ai-experts-predict-2026
Long, H., & Kennedy, C. (2025, October). New UChicago project explores how humanities can advance AI research. UChicago News. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/2025/10/new-uchicago-project-explores-how-humanities-can-advance-ai-research
Lu, J., Song, L., & Zhang, L. (2025). Cultural tendencies in generative AI (MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 6686-25). MIT Sloan School of Management. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Lu-Song-Zhang_CulturalTendencies_2025.pdf
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(6), 517–540.
Mirchandani, S., Xia, F., Florence, P., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Arenas, M. G., … Zeng, A. (2023). Large language models as general pattern machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04721.
Mitchell, M., & Krakauer, D. C. (2023). The debate over understanding in AI’s large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(13), e2215907120.
Mohsin, M. A., Umer, M., Bilal, A., Memon, Z., Qadir, M. I., Bhattacharya, S., … Cioffi, J. M. (2025). On the fundamental limits of LLMs at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12869.
Mollema, W. J. T. (2025). A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure. AI and Ethics, 5(5), 5535–5555.
Pavlović, P., & Hafner Fink, M. (2024). New ethnographic perspective on relational ethics in the field of artificial intelligence. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2413–2431.
Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
Petricini, T. (2025). The power of language: Framing AI as an assistant, collaborator, or transformative force in cultural discourse. AI & Society, 1–13.
Sharma, N. (2025, June). Role of artificial intelligence in intercultural dialogue and language: Ethical frameworks for sustainability and equity. In Innovative Multidisciplinary Approaches to Global Challenges: Sustainability, Equity, and Ethics in an Interconnected World (IMASEE 2025) (pp. 215–223). Atlantis Press.
Starmans, R. (2020). Prometheus unbound or paradise regained: The concept of causality in the contemporary AI–data science debate. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 161(1), 4–41.
Vallverdú, J. (2024). Do humans think causally, and how? In Causality for Artificial Intelligence: From a Philosophical Perspective (pp. 33–42). Springer Nature Singapore.
Wang, L. (2025). Can machines think beyond words? A critique of AI’s meaning-production process. AI & Society, 1–12.
Zhou, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence in sociology: A critical review and future directions. Filosofija. Sociologija, 35(4), 456–466.
